DoBeGreen

we share environmental information

Wednesday, Sep 08th

Last update04:38:25 PM GMT

You are here

Green Guide

 
 
Cell Phones: One of the largest causes of e-waste

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) says, “Recycle cell ¨

phones, it’s an easy call to make.” [1]

  

 

 

    

 

The average North American gets a new cell phone every 14 months.

According to the EPA, out of the 140 million cell phones discarded

by Americans in 2008, only about 10 per cent were recycled.

Moreover, their research concluded that if all the cell phones were

recycled, energy to 194,000 homes for one full year would be saved.[2]

 

Read more
 
Green Wineries Show the Way

Embracing eco-friendliness without compromises

Read more
 

Hartwell Paper—Seeking Solutions in wake of Copenhagen’s Debacle

Anubhav Kapoor

The Copenhagen Meet 2009 was unable to provide a unified platform to seek solutions for problems precipitated by the climate-change crisis. As a result, environmentalists and ecological conservationis...

Resolving your ‘Global Cooling’ Fears!

Anubhav Kapoor
Media coverage around the world seems overwhelmed with the theory that something parallel to the ‘Ice Age’, though a lot less extreme in terms of the intensity of freezing temperatures has been unleas...

Are consumers themselves suffocating green consumerism?

Anubhav Kapoor

Green lifestyle trends are being increasingly advocated around the world and every consumer-centric brand is becoming increasingly conscious of its ‘green’ image. Even the most conventional of consume...

Hotel in Rajasthan going green

Purva Bhandari

Fort Khejarla in Rajasthan, India has always been committed to sustainable development. Mr. Ramendra Bhandari, the Director believes every member of the team from the top-level Directors to the newest ...

Gustav Carlsson

Gustav Carlsson

Administrator
Gustav Carlsson-Finland-Swedish engineer and Geographes with the natural geography as a specialty. He lives in a medieval castle in France and divides his days between building boats and running Bed &...
Johan Ehrenberg

Johan Ehrenberg

Administrator

Johan Ehrenberg is CEO ETC Utveckling (production company), editor of the magazine ETC, CEO Egen El- alternative (electricity for domestic use, author etc...


Name: Johan Ehrenberg
Milk: Organic milk
Unkn...
Live Green, Die Green – Note on Greener Funerals

Live Green, Die Green – Note on Greener Funerals

Purva Bhandari
Almost 56 million people die every year with almost 155000 a day on average [1] . In addition to this, almost 1.6 tons of concrete is buried in the US while 16% of mercury emissions in UK are ...
Greener transportation

Greener transportation

Purva Bhandari
The need for transportation cannot be ignored. In all parts of the world, campaigns are being carried out to encourage people to use public transport and start car-pooling. However, using public trans...

Environmental Vegetarianism

Anubhav Kapoor

The entire world’s attention is focused towards the upcoming Copenhagen Meet wherein world leaders are expected to lay down a strategy of how nations will come together to prevent the certain, ecologica...

Geoengineering Our Climate Against Global Warming

The word ‘geoengineering’ is self-descriptive, i.e. it is a process of engineering (through technological and mechanical processes) changes in natural climatic conditions. To make it even simpler, Geoengineering refers to humans maneuvering the Earth’s climate for their advantage or for preventing climate-related calamities.

 

Geoengineering Our Climate Against Global Warming

 

 

The threat of global warming is now universally acknowledged and the number of international forums organized to address this issue seem to be increasing with every passing week. However, a worrying trend has emerged among all such global forums — we still don’t have uniform, globally executable solutions or authoritative regulations to resolve issues like rising levels of greenhouse gas emissions, among other factors that have contributed to the worsening climatic changes. In this scenario, it seems that rather than waiting for the entire world to somehow become harmonized towards the cause of stopping destructive climatic changes, we should have a more ‘hands-on’ approach wherein the threat of destructive weather patterns, induced due to global warming, is negated in a more precise and urgent manner.

 

It is in this regard, that the concept of using Geoengineering to the extent of negating the harmful impacts of rising sea levels and other conditions precipitated by global warming has been engaging a lot of attention. The word ‘geoengineering’ is self-descriptive, i.e. it is a process of engineering (through technological and mechanical processes) changes in natural climatic conditions. To make it even simpler, Geoengineering refers to humans maneuvering the Earth’s climate for their advantage or for preventing climate-related calamities.

 

Trying to Understand the Need for Geoengineering

 

To some folks, this idea may sound a bit overwhelming or outrightly frightening but it isn't as new as it may suggest. China has been inducing artificial rains among its rain-deficient provinces by firing chemically enhanced rockets into the upper layers of the atmosphere. For most environmentalists, the whole idea is a bit too progressive for being executed on a global scale but in a way, it does make sense. Why? For starters, this would remove the time gap present between advocating environmental policies and their actual implementation. Just consider the case of Euro IV emission standards for automobiles that are being increasingly endorsed in European nations but haven’t been introduced in many south-Asian nations. Further, many nations of the world simply aren't in a position to care about global warming through sensitizing their consumers or manufacturers towards ecologically destructive practices, i.e. survival is the topmost priority in such nations and environmental issues take a backseat. These limitations are faced by many, potentially effective environmental strategies and as a result, their impact on a global scale is redundant.

 

From an overall perspective, we need a more urgent solution to at least, arrest the growing number of destructive climatic trends being catalyzed by global warming. It is an established fact that the unpredictable rain and drought patterns that have been witnessed in the last five years will only worsen and the graduation to a greener lifestyle isn't happening at even a fraction of the required pace to stop such catastrophic developments. Considering the present circumstances, endorsing something as drastic as geoengineering does make sense.

 

Geoengineering Gathers Support

 

The idea has been discussed among the world’s leading scientists at the Copenhagen Consensus and further support has from credible resources like the American Meteorological Society, many scientists from Princeton and the National Academy. Perhaps the rising support stems from the fact that it has now been realized that unless there are spectacular cutbacks in carbon dioxide emissions by 2015, many nations would be pushed on the edge of absolute mayhem, fuelled mainly by global warming-related climatic disasters.

 

White House Agrees

Among the many epicenters from where the support for using geoengineering methods is spreading, the world’s most influential policymaker, i.e. the White House is increasingly taking centrestage. It is being remarked that using these methods at least in emergencies to negate the occurrence of highly probable natural calamities could soon become a reality. John Holdren, a leading environmental advisor at the White House, has been forthcoming about the use of geoengineering in the near future. The Nobel Prize-winner has agreed that such methods should be explored as the last option but he wasn’t critical of the basic notion that geoengineering puts forth — trying to alter the Earth’s natural climatic configuration.

 

The Royal Society: Geoengineering’s Biggest Endorser

Along with the September's Physics World conference that was hosted in the UK, the Royal Society has emerged as the most robust supporter of taking geoengineering to the stage of being operational in cases of major climatic calamities. The Royal Society has also urged that there is an urgent need to discuss geoengineering solutions as a part of the follow-up to the Kyoto Protocol. Geoengineering methods proposed by the Royal Society’s report titled — ‘Science, governance and uncertainty, September 2009’ pertains to manipulating some natural environmental settings to restrict the rate at which global warming is surging. Geoengineering methods proposed as a part of this Report can be divided into two basic groups:

CDR of Carbon Dioxide Removal techniques

SRM or Solar Radiation Management techniques

 

Both these methods have a single aim, i.e. to cut down the rising global temperatures. CDR pertains to fastening the rate of CO2 removal from the environment through artificially increasing the oceanic absorption of CO2. Massive, ocean-floor fertilization projects would have to be undertaken across all the major ocean bodies to make such CDR techniques effective. SRM is a rather simple phenomenon wherein the amount of sunrays reflected away from the Earth would have to be pumped-up by introducing reflective surfaces on a mass scale. This would include using special paint coatings for all manmade structures and the use of solar reflective crops. Solar-radiation management could be introduced in some very affordable formats such as injecting sulfur particles into the stratosphere in particular areas to encourage solar reflection of the sun’s rays even before they reach the Earth’s surface.

 

Geoengineering Techniques Need Introspection — the biggest deterrent for many suggested CDR/SDR technologies is the financial constraint in two forms, i.e. the massive funding needed to carry out confirmatory tests before using any of these proposed mechanisms in a real-life scenario and the eventual cost of an approved technology. Some recommended and effective geo-engineered proposals like the use of ‘artificial trees’, i.e. manmade structures laden with special panels to suck out carbon dioxide from the air, have already been dumped due to the visible financial infeasibility. These 'trees’ are supposedly easy-to-install and maintain but for most underdeveloped and developing nations they would have to be bought at astronomical prices. Similarly, many suggested theories have unresolved loopholes that need to be addressed. For example, Solar Radiation Management through injection of sulfate particles in the stratosphere could obliterate significant portions of an already depleted ozone layer.

 

Perceived Problems for Applying Geoengineering as a Solution

Geoengineering applications can be used by the poorer nations too as the technology doesn't need to be indigenously developed, i.e. it can be simply ordered through a global retail format, as long as the prices are kept competitive. However, many geo-engineered projects would need collaboration on cross-border basis. The most relevant example in this regard is the proposal of setting-up surface reflectors across deserts to negate the sunrays warming-up the Earth’s surface. However, this would mean the need for many political rivals to negotiate and resolve their differences as deserts are often spread across multiple boundaries.

 

For most conversationalists, trying to tweak the climate to our advantage itself is unacceptable. Their disapproval arises from the fact that most mechanized, manmade processes have been damaging in the longer run. Changing this perception is going to be the biggest challenge for those who support geoengineering methods for the unconventional and effective solutions they provide. It should be understood that geoengineering isn't a destructive approach at its core — it is merely a format of trying to restrict the damages we have initiated ourselves. Geoengineering our climate may sound too extreme but it could be useful as our last resort for resolving a crisis that threatens our existence.

 

 

 

 

Resources:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/04/08/tech/main4930539.shtml

http://ecological-problems.blogspot.com/2009/09/geoengineering-good-backup-option-to.html

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=27306

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=27248

http://royalsociety.org/displaypagedoc.asp?id=35094

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=27249

http://legalresearchplus.com/2009/08/07/geoengineering-reports-from-copenhagen-consensus/

http://www.bio-medicine.org/biology-news-1/Time-to-lift-the-geoengineering-taboo-9753-1/

 

 

How green is...?