DoBeGreen

we share environmental information

Sunday, Sep 05th

Last update04:38:25 PM GMT

You are here

Green Guide

 
 
Eco-Friendly Computing at Organizations
The objective of Green Computing just like other green initiatives is to reduce the usage of dangerous resources to boost energy efficiency and encourage recyclability and bio-degradability.

Read more
 
Geoengineering Our Climate Against Global Warming

The word ‘geoengineering’ is self-descriptive, i.e. it is a process of engineering (through technological and mechanical processes) changes in natural climatic conditions. To make it even simpler, Geoengineering refers to humans maneuvering the Earth’s climate for their advantage or for preventing climate-related calamities.

Read more...
 

Hartwell Paper—Seeking Solutions in wake of Copenhagen’s Debacle

Anubhav Kapoor

The Copenhagen Meet 2009 was unable to provide a unified platform to seek solutions for problems precipitated by the climate-change crisis. As a result, environmentalists and ecological conservationis...

Resolving your ‘Global Cooling’ Fears!

Anubhav Kapoor
Media coverage around the world seems overwhelmed with the theory that something parallel to the ‘Ice Age’, though a lot less extreme in terms of the intensity of freezing temperatures has been unleas...

Are consumers themselves suffocating green consumerism?

Anubhav Kapoor

Green lifestyle trends are being increasingly advocated around the world and every consumer-centric brand is becoming increasingly conscious of its ‘green’ image. Even the most conventional of consume...

Hotel in Rajasthan going green

Purva Bhandari

Fort Khejarla in Rajasthan, India has always been committed to sustainable development. Mr. Ramendra Bhandari, the Director believes every member of the team from the top-level Directors to the newest ...

Gustav Carlsson

Gustav Carlsson

Administrator
Gustav Carlsson-Finland-Swedish engineer and Geographes with the natural geography as a specialty. He lives in a medieval castle in France and divides his days between building boats and running Bed &...
Johan Ehrenberg

Johan Ehrenberg

Administrator

Johan Ehrenberg is CEO ETC Utveckling (production company), editor of the magazine ETC, CEO Egen El- alternative (electricity for domestic use, author etc...


Name: Johan Ehrenberg
Milk: Organic milk
Unkn...
Live Green, Die Green – Note on Greener Funerals

Live Green, Die Green – Note on Greener Funerals

Purva Bhandari
Almost 56 million people die every year with almost 155000 a day on average [1] . In addition to this, almost 1.6 tons of concrete is buried in the US while 16% of mercury emissions in UK are ...
Greener transportation

Greener transportation

Purva Bhandari
The need for transportation cannot be ignored. In all parts of the world, campaigns are being carried out to encourage people to use public transport and start car-pooling. However, using public trans...

Environmental Vegetarianism

Anubhav Kapoor

The entire world’s attention is focused towards the upcoming Copenhagen Meet wherein world leaders are expected to lay down a strategy of how nations will come together to prevent the certain, ecologica...

Environmental Vegetarianism

The entire world’s attention is focused towards the upcoming Copenhagen Meet wherein world leaders are expected to lay down a strategy of how nations will come together to prevent the certain, ecological disaster we are heading towards. The debates are centered on issues like carbon taxation and forging international relationships to cap carbon emissions. However, it’s a bit strange that among all the proposed sustainability solutions, one subject doesn't seem to engineer any kind of attention, i.e. are we eating away our planet’s chances of survival? This question essentially caters towards evaluating how our eating habits are contributing towards global warming.

 

 

Understanding the issue

Scientific studies conducted by organizations directly linked with the Copenhagen Meet, including the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (UN FAO), have concluded that the global meat industry is single-handedly responsible for a staggering one-fifth of the greenhouse gases that contribute towards global warming.

 

As compared to agricultural practices that grow mass-consumption foodgrains, using livestock, the meat industry has a much higher carbon footprint. The entire meat industry is based upon raising millions of livestock that have to be looked after, transported and packed and most of the involved, sub-processes are not energy-sensitive. Livestock like cattle are guilty of being nature’s biggest, gas-production units, pumping-out considerable volumes of greenhouse gases like methane and nitrous oxide.

 

Nitrous oxide is considered nearly 300 times more effective than carbon dioxide in terms of global warming. It is a major by-product of animal manure, common to the livestock industry.

 

Globally, methane production is much lesser than that of carbon dioxide which is the major by-product of using fossil fuels. However, methane degrades much quicker and it is nearly 22 times more potent than CO2. It creates a stronger blanketing affect than CO2 thereby contributing more significantly towards global warming.

 

It is worth highlighting that carbon dioxide and methane are amongst the most critical of greenhouse gases among major meat-eating nations like the US wherein they together account for 90% of the annual greenhouse emissions. While many initiatives have been taken upon to arrest the CO2 emissions from vehicle and industrial pollution, methane emissions haven’t engaged the same level of intensity from environmental agencies. Further, many supplementary costs to rearing animals are usually unaccounted. This includes large-scale deforestation to ensure substantial land for animal-grazing and growing fodder crops on land that could have been used for growing foodgrains that are substantially cheaper and can fulfill the dietary needs of many starving nations.

 

Researches conducted at leading institutions like the University of Chicago have ascertained that turning over to a vegan diet makes bigger carbon savings that choosing an electrically powered car over a petrol-guzzling automobile. Nearly 64% of Ammonia emissions are sourced from the meat industry but only trace amounts are found in vehicular pollutants.

 

In fact, many researchers are convinced that innocent looking, grass munching cattle and most grazing animals reared for dairy products and retailed meat are more harmful than polluting vehicles! This might be exaggerating a bit but some facts cannot be ignored. Just imagine how expensive some of greener, low-emission solutions are turning out to be — average households cannot sustain expensive solar panels and windmill-generated power turns out to expensive when transported to grids far away from windy landscapes. Even electrical cars are not without an environmental impact, as they do depend upon electricity for powering the low emission engines. Isn't it plainly obvious that rather than powering ourselves through nuclear energy or asking entire populations to changeover to using biofuel-powered cars, eating smaller portions of meat can prove to be a much simpler (and practical) exercise towards curbing carbon emissions?

 

Agricultural Livestock versus Livestock reared for meat production

Consider this figurative comparison — nearly 441 gallons of water is needed to produce one pound of retailed meat whereas only 14 gallons is needed for producing one pound of wheat. Further, the amount of grain stock fed to the livestock reared for meat production could feed nearly 800 million people!

 

“We can’t handle the truth”

The idea of endorsing a ‘greater’ degree of vegetarianism in our daily food habits for the sake of our ecosystem’s sustainability was first put forth by Dr. Rajendra Pachauri, a staunch Hindu vegetarian who was at the helm of operations at the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). His recommendation invoked the expected reaction — he was diagnosed with someone trying to enforce his personal, religious inclinations in the pretext of trying to present a new way of being eco-friendly. For most folks, the idea of eating lesser meat to save the planet sounded ‘blasphemous’.

 

Dr. Pachauri’s recommendation to give-up eating meat for merely one day in a week was interpreted as a blatant attempt to promote vegetarianism.

 

However, the core of Dr. Pachauri’s theory was not about indirectly promoting the idea of pure vegetarianism or endorsing any religious belief — he was merely stating a fact wherein decreased dependence upon meats and dairy products procured from animal farming could significantly help to cut down upon carbon emissions, across regions with higher concentrations of meat-eating communities. One reason for the outright discrimination of this proposal lay in the fact that it was applicable to the worldwide community but it did not have substantial backing in the form of regional or international governments or noteworthy environmentalist of global fame vouching for the practicality of this proposal.

 

Extreme changes are not necessarily needed

The idea of ‘Eco-diets’ needs to be explored to realize that it isn't demanding and doesn't call for wholesome changes in an individual’s dietary pattern. It doesn't mean that meat consumption is being discriminated or hardcore vegetarian habits are being endorsed. If you want to reduce the ecological footprint of your food, then you can make a significant contribution by making small deductions in the amount of meat and meat-based products that you consume in a week, rather than abandoning them. This entire concept does not try to promote vegan diet in any, conceivable way. The emphasis is upon making small contributions that add-up substantially when the entire society realizes the importance of some daily, self-restrictive practices. This essentially means that if you are holding back from taking a third serving of your favorite meat dish, you are making an actual contribution towards reducing your daily, carbon footprint.

                                                                                                                          

Are we brave enough to accept the reality?

The ecological impact of livestock goods’ consumption has been accepted by many environmental agencies but largely ignored from a policy-making perspective wherein it is seldom mentioned in global policies formulated for curbing greenhouse gas emissions. Even the most renowned faces who have heralded the cause of taking drastic measures to arrest global warming, including Al Gore, have distanced themselves from this issue. Talking about cars with expensive fuel cells and solar panels is easy since we all realize that such technologies will take time to present themselves in an affordable manner and as a result, there is no urgency to adopt such green measures. However, environmental vegetarianism is immediately adoptable. It does need some self-determination to alter conventional eating habits but the results are immediately palpable and there is no price tag on adopting it. Environmentalists can go to the extreme of imploring people to become self-righteous and choose bicycling over using their cars but making some personal (gastronomic) sacrifices like reducing weekly, meat rations should be emphasized upon, purely for the ease with which such effective measures can be embraced.

 

Just consider this — you cannot switch over to the latest electrical car overnight, but one less portion of a juicy beef-stake on the table tonight is realistic, isn't it?

 

Resources:           

http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/environment/article/0,28804,1602354_1603074_1603171,00.html

http://www.mla.com.au/NR/rdonlyres/CC42C90A-6A54-4647-8E4C-8EF4C60FD8C7/0/ClimateChangeInsert_7.pdf

http://priceofmeat.com/2009/04/21/americans-contribute-the-most-to-meats-impact-on-global-warming-duh/

http://maxandruffys.com/environmental-impacts-of-the-meat-industry

http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=are_cows_worse_than_cars

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/28/AR2009072800390.html

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/10/foodprint.php

http://www.all-creatures.org/articles/env-themeat.html

http://earthsave.org/environment/foodchoices.htm

 

How green is...?